[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)
From: I <beatthebastards@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:32:22 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 22:32:39 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; d=inbox.com; s=s1; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fC1UMb4SyzBby/iu2FKMnkTvZiqG42szzotcNL1Ugac=; b=fCtLScQEpCQxuMWZWK+9t6kOzVdpVLbNImL5F06bH0bBXl3ybfdjQD7wPQDhuNmpwFNC eh6abFvkPJKjimAs4WZ44rJ4JcGfRaG7QwV8td8O1nfo/pDjCITYQ+1SB5nxy4+Kabuez5 QcDIj+Xh3LhM6bSmINv4NoihVl0yLXK/4=
Domainkey-signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=inbox.com; s=s1; h=mime-version:date:message-id:from:subject:to:content-type; b=AEwpARdde3AeV4WnfKip3bYRj/6EgR+rCt+HJ4w0ZWiB/xVayi04IUnP9jWWJOEjGICr dYs/gvNvbfU9RToRIUgPu1GhFfUCGqtEICRA/Mf05vaqi/wMOENNGRlfhh8ag/K/41NGWk q9CArN4q0F06v38gtIv7K349SnJaI+65A=
In-reply-to: <1435111788.157629295@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <354635.85540.bm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

...an excellent point

Robert

> From: swsnyder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 22:09:48 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> I worry about those relays with a heroic uptime.  How is it that they
> haven't needed to reboot in, say, nine months? No security updates to the
> kernel or glibc in all that time?  Really?
> 
> In these days when governments, with their expertise and
> multi-billion-dollar budgets, get infiltrated I wonder how easy it would
> be get some monitoring malware onto machines that run Tor relays.  That
> seems a lot more likely to me than the scare stories about the NSA/GCHQ
> running a lot of nodes themselves.


_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)
  - From: Virgil Griffith

References:
- [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)
  - From: saitosean
- Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)
  - From: Steve Snyder

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Exit relay is apparently being used to attack other servers
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Raspberry Pi - Relay Setup
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread