On 07 Jun (19:41:00), nusenu wrote: > DocTor [1] made me look into this. > > _All_ 65 relays in the following table have the following characteristics: > (not shown in the table to safe some space) Yah, we got a report on bad-relays@ as well... We are looking into this but seems there is a distinctive pattern for most of them. David > > - OS: Linux > - run two instances per IP address (the number of relays is only odd > because in one case they created 3 keys per IP) > - ORPort: random > - DirPort: disabled > - Tor Version: 0.2.9.10 > - ContactInfo: None > - MyFamily: None > - Joined the Tor network between 2017-06-07 15:37:32 and 2017-06-07 > 16:08:54 (UTC) > - Exit Policy summary: {u'reject': [u'25', u'119', u'135-139', u'445', > u'563', u'1214', u'4661-4666', u'6346-6429', u'6699', u'6881-6999']} > - table is sorted by colmns 3,1,2 (in that order) > > > - Group diversity: > - 20 distinct autonomous systems > - 18 distinct countries > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/81337aed747ea5c7dec57899b0e27e94/raw/c7e0c4538e4f424b4cc529f3c2b1cabf6a5df579/2017-06-07_tor_network_65_relays_group.txt > > > > Relay fingerprints are at the bottom of this file. > > This list of relays is NOT identical to the one from DocTor (even though > the number is identical (65)): > [1] > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2017-June/007968.html > > https://twitter.com/nusenu_/status/872536564647198720 > > > -- > https://mastodon.social/@nusenu > https://twitter.com/nusenu_ > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays -- F3vakg18tijjqFR690AknN2mb+hDT7jRDxYnpDPmVjY=
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays