On 07 Jun (19:41:00), nusenu wrote:
> DocTor [1] made me look into this.
>
> _All_ 65 relays in the following table have the following characteristics:
> (not shown in the table to safe some space)
Yah, we got a report on bad-relays@ as well... We are looking into this but
seems there is a distinctive pattern for most of them.
David
>
> - OS: Linux
> - run two instances per IP address (the number of relays is only odd
> because in one case they created 3 keys per IP)
> - ORPort: random
> - DirPort: disabled
> - Tor Version: 0.2.9.10
> - ContactInfo: None
> - MyFamily: None
> - Joined the Tor network between 2017-06-07 15:37:32 and 2017-06-07
> 16:08:54 (UTC)
> - Exit Policy summary: {u'reject': [u'25', u'119', u'135-139', u'445',
> u'563', u'1214', u'4661-4666', u'6346-6429', u'6699', u'6881-6999']}
> - table is sorted by colmns 3,1,2 (in that order)
>
>
> - Group diversity:
> - 20 distinct autonomous systems
> - 18 distinct countries
>
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/81337aed747ea5c7dec57899b0e27e94/raw/c7e0c4538e4f424b4cc529f3c2b1cabf6a5df579/2017-06-07_tor_network_65_relays_group.txt
>
>
>
> Relay fingerprints are at the bottom of this file.
>
> This list of relays is NOT identical to the one from DocTor (even though
> the number is identical (65)):
> [1]
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2017-June/007968.html
>
> https://twitter.com/nusenu_/status/872536564647198720
>
>
> --
> https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
> https://twitter.com/nusenu_
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
--
F3vakg18tijjqFR690AknN2mb+hDT7jRDxYnpDPmVjY=
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays