[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Performance

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Performance
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 11:12:52 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 11:13:12 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=q4XJGXGnEcumKeAmb0WwUs/91V7GE35kjwuy4vvnZr4=; b=JGa/KfLdqxbl4t2sTOedah+iP4SgWAOPyDjbQMjsD7yaIY0aqb3o8ncdrZN6e8HWpH R66npdVOwqfofp3O8X0o/AbZvNx7NDx/KCgi88Kl+ff+zXvmykEV7fk/5WXR0bc7pQtk l01R8O0h0ZFwHRa7+je8iVE7YD19Yw5uOANPvyeu42/sD5QA+TGsNNiSbz6Gn3CFfNmD yme9SJ7YOKgbAzVTeVrIQ/7WqdzziOIODYr1vCrKKUniLtBEBozueBY0AJXGUO0H9mA5 p+alIGXgPMRZIxakmPLBYIiR/6sDWVITaZVi+kkh2z19jy+QHGWAE7tuFXtF5GYNx2EO i1cQ==
In-reply-to: <5e50ef81-49a1-c508-5f0e-c8172c0c4000@riseup.net>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <15cdee700e0.27d8.e04ee758f2dadc1889b5b423dda555f9@urbach.org> <5e50ef81-49a1-c508-5f0e-c8172c0c4000@riseup.net>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 7:58 AM, nusenu <nusenu-lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Sebastian Urbach:
>> I could not find anything wrong and checked:
>>
>> https://metrics.torproject.org/torperf.html
>>
>> Is it just me or does that looks like a major Performance Downgrade for
>> the whole Network since 0.3.0.x was introduced ?
>
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/metrics-team/2017-June/000386.html


That said, we rely on operator-submitted profiles to keep Tor relay
performance from regressing.  If anybody has time to profile a relay
using the steps in doc/HACKING/HelpfulTools.md, that would rock.

(warning; instructions might need work too.)

-- 
Nick
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Performance, profiling
  - From: nusenu

References:
- [tor-relays] Performance
  - From: Sebastian Urbach
- Re: [tor-relays] Performance
  - From: nusenu

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] libzstd and/or liblzma
Next by Author: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Performance
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Performance, profiling
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread