On 2018-06-21 08:25, Matthew Glennon wrote:
> Relays intending to act as Guards choose port 443 because it (and 80) are
> usually reachable in the tightest of network security situations (where
> traffic destined for most all other ports is blocked at the
> gateway/firewall.) At least that's my reasoning for it.
I run a bridge [1] on other ports (9030 and 9001). How much would it
help to move it to port 80? I think at the time I configured it I still
had a normal http server on port 80, but this no longer applies.
That depends on your target audience. Because you're a Bridge, you need to advertise your entry point in external ways. If the audience you're reaching can't get to you on the ports you choose then considering other ports is an option.
By the way: why can I not see the ports (under OR Addresses) or anything
under Transport protocols in the metrics listing?
I believe this is because you're a bridge. The entire point of a Bridge is to be hidden from the censors trying to block entry to the Tor Network, so we don't want to publish that information on Metrics.
[1]
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/EEB31B5D6DE98CFA1C3243DA0E7CFDAA08D53593
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists
which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays