On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:23:54PM +0200, kantorkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hey. > Hello, > Am 6/9/21 um 9:51 PM schrieb Andreas Kempe: > > > > We have this page with some tips: > > > https://community.torproject.org/relay/community-resources/tor-relay-universities/ > > > > > > > I read through the page before mailing the list and I especially > > appreciate the template letter from EFF. I am hoping that a system of > > standardised response e-mails can be realised to lessen the burden of > > handling complaints. Maybe with some degree of automation? > > That is totally possible. At Artikel10 (https://artikel10.org/), we use Zammad to realize some degree of automation. We ignore some mails, some receive our standard reply. > Thank you for the suggestion. We'll have a look. > > > > > Here's a project that other members of our community have used in > > > the past and that you could adapt for your university: > > > https://www.overleaf.com/project/541e42eddb749944790bd16d > > > > > > And as Matthias said, you can find more relays outside .EDU, for > > > example, this non-exit node hosted by our friends in University of > > > Campinas, in Brazil: > > > https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/1E7BDE03151AAB779CB4AFEAEEA52536FFAA9400 > > > > > Here you find our experiences from running Tor exits at two German universities: > https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04277 > I got this shared off-list and was asked to not spread it since it wasn't yet uploaded to arxiv. Good to see that it is now made public. Having a fresh example like this is great! > > > > I don't think running a non-exit node would be an issue since they > > won't generate nearly as much abuse. I have considered looking at > > running normal nodes or possibly bridges if we hit a wall regarding > > exit nodes. > > > > (My relay at university is a low-bandwidth relay but...) If abuse is an issue, you could allow fewer ports or even ports 80, 443 only. In the past months, most abuse mails that I received were about port 22. > Yes, we were planning to run with a reduced exit policy and I'm pretty sure that the IT department will have opinions about it as well if we get to run a relay. Cordially, Andreas Kempe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays