[tor-relays] multiple tor nodes on one router? was first using bridge then become bridge

Subject: [tor-relays] multiple tor nodes on one router? was first using bridge then become bridge

From: Lorenz Kirchner <znerol2@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:51:40 +0800

Delivery-date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:51:53 -0400

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Jfp+ydoMc1uZW6eLxoBeFUlRwguK8Zyu3sKqYRcbPHY=; b=n7vD1l9/glOYE6ttUkQbiVV3QUn5Jay9OBx2HeLMUrJ3n5RYXdQ9uFbw8erNUafY8N Ylj31xBwKO46y6YGVladEhMgbKtqKSZOSRaXrMkCt800cLnQR46GoQ4895vB1oqAHCC7 iYleY9eYFIEdZcExHmZR2nGWkKd8TCW7Yf1aI=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wNpcNlF6B2AiVhLA32ve3IwrPqaoQWweDVjXhr9cvXn3Kw86oWzqW3bDEXKkJSz8hZ c9h86T8DVCIXisvEwLILMtMAQidjwR6kna3bOhyzrpqt3q0PIYURE/mFVVB2tpFhuym3 PeOXdZOIlkzm++NriFFRqiQ24rUSvsfztrIHM=

List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>

List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>

List-id: "This mailing list is for support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)." <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>

List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>

List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

so I received no hint as to how or whether to pursue this thought... i shall find other sources of information I just started reading the manual, would you believe it..

I have a new question now, I currently have set up number of tor relays on my router which are loadbalanced using squid... in the hope to increase throughput and perhaps achieve increased anonymity by sending requests for one site through different tor routes...

Is that advisable or even effective? My feeling is that the connection is somewhat more reliable than with just one tor relay.. and following on with this could one of these relays be set up to connect to tor via a bridge and then pass directory info on to the other relays running on the same machine?

Kind regards,

Loz

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Lorenz Kirchner <znerol2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 3/9/11 11:29 PM, mick wrote:

This this:
https://sites.google.com/a/infosecurity.ch/testst/

It's the google spreadsheet that load the bridge information embedded
into a google site.

I need a google account for that. What if I don't want one?

So, any new ideas anybody? I still feel it would be best if 1. there was a special function within tor to change from using a bridge to becoming a bridge whithin the censored network, and 2. spreading this bridge-status info locally... perhaps like dht in torrent.. only revealing a small selection of available bridges nearby.. i obviously only have a very dim idea of what i'm talking about.. sorry about that

anyways, if these two problems could be addressed tor could be a biggie with a lot of people here.. ;) -- think: cheap openwrt low maintenance appliance..

Loz

_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays