[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?
From: I <beatthebastards@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 17:03:32 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:03:43 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; d=inbox.com; s=s1; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/oVvqrk+zljUsINbd3o5YpHeHTDwbSEdXZd+NUGXtkc=; b=AASI6wtQ5ZmuyKAV7VjpdauclnM/4eZSE5UmbhuXY6Eap8KUfDD3pTWtIXfej2hIHlLu pXu0Q1mJofQo6eNURX6kHcoZKsXsOJ0ZA97eMM3DCqrJD1Om0tx6dbTDb0XxizHl5DWHYp UV7zzDjzbCybH+XOpPa1umrbNW7Yi10rE=
Domainkey-signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=inbox.com; s=s1; h=mime-version:date:message-id:from:subject:to:content-type; b=MYq4ft5XAzAmmgK9zFNQabWWJkvPCjqOe1b6jxNRv6kr8rn9isfZhmkUsXx+Sf9u+mSU Jx1+Tvu1wpyvKHB8hFTmw7EYR+UhJGFVMMQBSN/E0nlpD8MVHPlsEXkZ0EoRVpTxybvzoU kqDIbIhIwTbFd09ixlNL875kLfv473wzE=
In-reply-to: <144a41dc3d0.27ae.e04ee758f2dadc1889b5b423dda555f9@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <cad2ti2-g6gvmmkisg+x1tbftcxwa8wmwm5f=hewbfakmzxiitq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8e793279a36.00000437beatthebastards@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Tor hidden services â a safe haven for cybercriminals
https://www.securelist.com/en/blog/8187/Tor_hidden_services_a_safe_haven_for_cybercriminals

The inevitable move - 64-bit ZeuS has come enhanced with Tor
https://www.securelist.com/en/blog/208214171/The_inevitable_move_64_bit_ZeuS_has_come_enhanced_with_Tor

ChewBacca - a new episode of Tor-based Malware
https://www.securelist.com/en/blog/208214185/ChewBacca_a_new_episode_of_Tor_based_Malware

The first Tor Trojan for Android
https://www.securelist.com/en/blog/8184/The_first_Tor_Trojan_for_Android


_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?
  - From: Andrew Lewman

References:
- Re: [tor-relays] botnets run on Tor
  - From: Sebastian Urbach

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] botnets run on Tor
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Are zealous connections to directory port common?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] botnets run on Tor
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Is Kaspersky right to be concerned?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread