> I have seen mentions on this list of people using pi-hole and > unbound DNS servers in their setups, and I wondered if others had > considered opinions as to the usefulness of doing this. Pi-hole's > biggest feature seems to be their filter lists to block extra/evil > DNS queries, while Unbound seems to feature caching and validating > functions. I would think that a DNS cache that kept queries for a > long time would certainly keep most of your queries out of an ISP's > DNS logs. Or are there DNS providers that are relatively immune to > their logs being requited by others? I believe it is beneficial to run caching and validating resolver directly on tor exit relays, but please do not interfere with DNS resolution by using DNS blacklists. -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays