[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: çå:_problem_with_bridges_and_a_suggestion
- To: "tor-relays" <tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: çå:_problem_with_bridges_and_a_suggestion
- From: "frank" <for.tor.bridge@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:45:34 +0800
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: tor-relays-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 26 May 2010 03:46:31 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:references :subject:message-id:x-mailer:disposition-notification-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y9lEa6wt5HojrwEEMPrlsErofseXUGj5PYx/T5rrYK0=; b=mcmrKf4tuc83llmTPeXCm/LOJpACsulJ0shW25H1a4t98rTEnQUSC4zkrR4DAiMu+l yHmaK6+KzUV0QuX46eaTuI4fhNNNNg3AhHTT1CsJ9wk0DcJvxaxqZKXz20WjhNuhuO6h sjw/MooftegkQ06ufh7X/wvaT+sIJLhtH/WGU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:references:subject:message-id:x-mailer :disposition-notification-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=quomV40TiHFjiyHkbSCkf1XDeFSVm5TAv85rs8cqCpz4TmjQhyMYKjjbfsPMUQKqeM 9Q9OBdyU4HWKhWwdAsFuBivYILsLqbodGduIHyJdVZ3mdA9xC2W9rCYgYFOTsNNXvvSm aKMz/pEZE6pywng2LLUCnJ7RcsaYlGuQdr5xw=
- References: <4bfc8a18.29f88e0a.71ae.ffffec23@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wistal,
what do you mean by "åïéååïçåäåæåäå"?
"åïéååïçåäåæåäå"æåææï
sincerely,
frank
2010-05-26
-------------------------------------------------------------
sender: wistal
sending date: 2010-05-26 10:40:36
receiver: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
subject: çå:_problem_with_bridges_and_a_suggestion
åïéååïçåäåæåäåï
----- ååéä -----
åää: t f <for.tor.bridge@xxxxxxxxx>
åéæé: 2010å5æ25æ ææä 17:23
æää: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
äé: problem with bridges and a suggestion
dear friends,
problem:
china is blockingÂTORÂ more and more strict,
I can'tÂestablish a TOR circuitÂeven IÂupdated bridges in config file
of torrc with info retrievedÂfrom https://bridges.torproject.orgÂand
email replies from bridges@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
this morning,ÂI got some new bridges through a hidden https proxy and
established a TOR circuit, but after some time, I lost the connection
and couldn't establish a TOR circuit any more.
from my knowledge to china's blocking methods, I believe they found my
newly got bridges through network traffic protocol analysis, and
blocked them.
so my suggestion is:
1.
use a general protocol for TOR clients to interact with bridges, so
that they can't distinguish the traffic between TOR clients and
bridges,
so that they can't find new bridges got through private ways.
2.
the general protocol could be https which is encryption protected;
the general protocol could be plain http, if you can encode its
content dynamically and privately, and don't make it display any
fingerprints.
by the way, I'm not a native english speaker, please pardon my awkward english.
sincerely
frank