[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: When placing nodes in a family is appropriate

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: When placing nodes in a family is appropriate
From: Moritz Bartl <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 04:25:02 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tor-relays-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 30 May 2010 22:25:27 -0400
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimjm-Tp2bt7hmweq9W1zRawmxq8mwo2g8oBuHo7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <0783A18E-1C52-4088-B02D-6100B5E02D7A@xxxxxxx> <AANLkTimjm-Tp2bt7hmweq9W1zRawmxq8mwo2g8oBuHo7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4

This could be added as clarification to the documentation as is.

On 30.05.2010 22:35, Flamsmark wrote:
> If two nodes are run by the same person or organization they should be
> in the same family. If someone controls two (or more) nodes, they can
> connect the dots, reducing Tor to a 2-hop, or 1-hop proxy. Even if they
> are trustworthy, this makes them open to coercion. Any nodes under the
> control of the same person should be in the same family.

References:
- When placing nodes in a family is appropriate
  - From: Justin Aplin
- Re: When placing nodes in a family is appropriate
  - From: Flamsmark

Prev by Author: Tor Exit Node hosting: torservers.net
Next by Author: Re: FW: Ofcom Update: Draft code of practice to reduce online copyright infringement
Previous by thread: Re: When placing nodes in a family is appropriate
Next by thread: Nodes in the same ISP? - was: When placing nodes in a family is appropriate
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread