On Tue, 22 May 2012 16:21:46 -0500 Jon <torance.ca@xxxxxxxxx> allegedly wrote: > > > The port was 57734 - of course that doesn't mean another port could > be used That looks like a source port to me. In my case, the (allegedly) attacked ports were 80, so clearly webservers. Mick --------------------------------------------------------------------- blog: baldric.net fingerprint: E8D2 8882 F7AE DEB7 B2AA 9407 B9EA 82CC 1092 7423 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays