[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-relays] Tor Consensus Weight Stuck at 20 (Even on Relay with "Stable" Flag)
Hey I have almost the same problem with my relay (https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/DABC2440E9EAAEDB23F150CF95656405917A7829)
I stuck to Consensus Weight: 20 since over one week. If I look at the "collected dataâ I se the âunmetered = 1â comment. :(
Any Ideas how to fix this? Is this the normal and wanted behavior?
Best regards,
Marcus
> Am 10.05.2015 um 13:54 schrieb Network Operations Center <noc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> hey,
>
> can you do me a favor and remove the exit status of your relay and turn it into a regular node? I experienced the same problem as you:
>
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/3D7E274A87D9A89AF064C13D1EE4CA1F184F2600
>
> but ever since I removed the exit-flag I am generating some consensus rating again. This problem first popped during the last days of 2014 and up until now there hasn't been any reliable fix. Apparently even deleting the ID of your tor-node didn't help according to one user.
>
> On 10.05.2015 07:05 AM, Larry Brandt wrote:
>> yes
>> I have experienced the same problem on my exit relay:
>> DDC6C968B3DFD156C97FD71808758D251B66DBB2
>> My relay lost the stable flag due to a inadvertent shut-down a few days back.
>> LB
>> On 5/9/2015 1:38 PM, Neel Chauhan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have a Tor relay
>>> (https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/342587A287603040A49BB364D72EAC0B6BC3D71A)
>>> running from a FreeBSD server at my house on with a 5 megabit upstream
>>> connection.
>>> I have seen that lately, Tor's "Consensus Weight" value on this relay has
>>> not been going anywhere above (or below) 20. My relay has gotten the
>>> "Stable" flag, but yet didn't see it's consensus weight value rise.
>>> I decided to look at https://consensus-health.torproject.org/, and saw
>>> that two of the four bandwidth consensus servers, namely tor26
>>> (86.59.21.38) and longclaw (199.254.238.52) don't seem to be calculating
>>> any consensus value for Tor relays in the last few days.
>>> Has anyone else been having this problem? And if the Tor consensus
>>> operators are reading this, (approximately) when would this problem get
>>> resolved?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Neel Chauhan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays