++ 25/05/15 12:48 -0400 - tor@xxxxxxx:
>
>A lot of trouble would be prevented for exit node operators if, when they
>brought their relays up for the first time, they ensured that the exit policy
>rejected port 25. Even if they desire to run as unrestricted a relay as
>possible, in my experience, that one really should be rejected. It is the
Some (or most or even all) of the Leaseweb nodes didn't forward port 25.
So, alltough you advice is a good one, it's not applicable to some (or
most or even all) of the nodes that are discussed in this thread.
--
Rejo Zenger
E rejo@xxxxxxxxx | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl
T @rejozenger | J rejo@xxxxxxxxx
OpenPGP 1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532 A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4
XMPP OTR 271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF 4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF
Signal 0507 A41B F4D6 5DB4 937D E8A1 29B6 AAA6 524F B68B
93D4 4C6E 8BAB 7C9E 17C9 FB28 03
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays