On Sun, 8 May 2016 14:43:42 +0100 mick <mbm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 8 May 2016 02:46:42 +0500 > Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx> allegedly wrote: > > > > (That said, yeah, as others have replied DO TOS only restricts > > "grandfathered" accounts in this regard.) > > Again, not so. I have a grandfathered account. DO have never had a > problem with my Tor node (or my other high traffic VMs). You cannot argue that DO TOS doesn't have that restriction because it does, however I never said they actually enforce it, at least currently. My guess is when they implement bandwidth metering (yes the worst-kept "secret" about DO is that ALL their VMs are bandwidth unmetered at the moment), that's when they will start looking at grandfathered accounts abusing their remaining unmetered status and stripping them off it if any abuse found. -- With respect, Roman
Attachment:
pgpdT099PPrrV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays