Re: [tor-relays] SPOOFED: Re: Ext Relay Operators: Please Upgrade to 0.4.7.7!

[Kushal Das <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 20/05/22, Ladar Levison via tor-relays wrote:
> On 5/20/22 8:06 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
> > EPEL generally never updates anything major, and I think in this case
> > they counted it as a major update. More details can be found at [0].
> >
> > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Updates_Policy
> >
> You are correct, in that they don't like to replace a version package to
> get trivial updates or new features. BUT for critical issues, they
> either backport the requisite fix/feature/code, or if that isn't
> feasible, update the package. And if using 0.4.5.11 means those relays
> will get booted from the network, it would seem to qualify as important.
> 
> I don't know about EPEL, but Red Hat, if it's possible, likes to release
> major package update along with an OS point release. For example, a
> number of packages got major upgrades along with the 8.5 to 8.6 release
> on May 10th.
> 
> I don't have any inside info, which is why I asked the list. But I think
> that when it comes to EPEL packages, the community maintainer makes
> these kinds of decisions. And Mister Perry did a good job of making the
> update sound important. So I was wondering if a) anyone was in touch
> with maintainer, or he was on this list, and could tell us when an
> update would arrive, etc?
I am not sure if the EPEL maintainer is on this list. I started
building the rpm packages because I found there were a delay in getting
the latest Tor packages in Fedora. And that was before the current
maintainer at Fedora picked up from the previous maintainer.

This is also the reason why I keep pushing the latest update to our rpm
repository.

Kushal
-- 
Public Interest Technologist
CPython Core Developer
Director, Python Software Foundation
https://kushaldas.in
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays