[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Deploy relays using hidden exit IP's?

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Deploy relays using hidden exit IP's?
From: tagnaq <tagnaq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:46:44 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 06:50:57 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hU8mNTG8ojf8E1lhxBkGevpDxgAZEprtiQlcBLakhF4=; b=Yhjbs52aPEhOajrUsS5rZwDnP7aDAfWtTL9u/PS/4igC7QJzS3tmW/X/kw5QuCB37U PHBPXDuK2upxPs/Gc3YvYPLB+lXEZBI/pV/L4sGSQis1om+3nHK6IPpMZZFWX3Z6HkVe VjOmKHjumLbzIKAJzBDKpojr2B/bKq++QJqQvTiBxX9osbCUzwcMR+iV95opR7yC1M1A dg7wvR93gGSWeihNF2rnUBBiWWEkNSTOVpP/BD6jZiL4O1p4TtsyhpFfhAooOVxgXxSr vfdq0wwVdJ756woSuqSpxFTtXuTl3NuxTgLX+/kEW1/9G6Yovs0/W7uqkvBOdD5Fhm3n GApg==
In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti2_tBjU_0P2RV=H_TWuM5j160YCNK6eR8bhr82ixjO+_Ng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAD2Ti2_tBjU_0P2RV=H_TWuM5j160YCNK6eR8bhr82ixjO+_Ng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

> Shouldn't some exit relays (funded or not) be deployed to use an
> exit IP that is different from it's advertised exit IP in order to
> prevent a simplistic form of blocking based on scraping the
> descriptor set? I think this can happen if the default route is out
> another interface or secondary address. Something of that nature.

Actually I think this is a great idea and allows Tor to be used when
it wasn't possible or painful before.

How does the Torproject and the major Tor network operators think
about it?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF4EAREKAAYFAlCws6QACgkQyM26BSNOM7YoUwEAtsrq4+zcKVDMM1mrAz1Up/rC
YH6UhTVI3i2bWUQsRxYA/iMVMYJscqKlQgVVVdJcUkkg5T29yIQCD8CWoLHRlaAG
=89ZU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Deploy relays using hidden exit IP's?
  - From: Moritz Bartl

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] Fw: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Next by Author: [tor-relays] Akamai running Tor exit relays
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Setting up new Tor relay
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Deploy relays using hidden exit IP's?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread