[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Amazon abuse report

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Amazon abuse report
From: I <beatthebastards@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 14:03:53 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:04:11 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; d=inbox.com; s=s1; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=l2jsHD89LsLujolLWz7vnPCapaMyb1RcZIW1q+QCpJg=; b=Oo8tc6Nl4aLZb1fhrpnlO6+YRtABVEUMfao6CkHEI6M8foXs2KFbK3UDYL506K5PB632 0aCaz8jxs1YmRuY9vC8GnEhWzClG1h0NWfs8pm153drPJX5mFDt8oHUN9Z5Eqa7vWHp1Mi fQRsZ5W9j3g+OhQu+mWWB8BH7hmEJXJA0=
Domainkey-signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=inbox.com; s=s1; h=mime-version:date:message-id:from:subject:to:content-type; b=GImKnFMl9h+lVO07VPQhlinZTG4Qp+cv1U8RstUXA5SZOS7In9jEq5xn3mWN8ge6FREF UdqWKDd1mQlj6UJQdNfNfCvooLx/XzGzqmP9CZDmVEjfXX/zf+KFoRDSNtbtgd8cGwiNrV +DCR7IC1jQHQAxhuZlMLN18GrK3ku91QQ=
In-reply-to: <4222914.4gPCmHJ6KY@vostok>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1647753.6v2exikpib@vostok> <20131101015240.gy31806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52746b45.3010700@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Putting the extensive exit restriction policy in the responses to take-down demands seems like a good idea. 

Robert


> Publication of sample exit policies?  Would that encourage exit node
> operators
> to run restricted exit policies, and save themselves loads of bandwidth
> and
> DMCA headache?
> 
> Is there a forum where one can put up a sticky post with sample exit
> policies
> so that operators can simply cut and paste them into their setups?

> parity.boy@xxxxxxxxx

____________________________________________________________
TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if5
Capture screenshots, upload images, edit and send them to your friends
through IMs, post on TwitterÂ, FacebookÂ, MySpaceâ, LinkedInÂ â FAST!


_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- Re: [tor-relays] Amazon abuse report
  - From: Paritesh Boyeyoko

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Amazon abuse report
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Is there any reason to keep the default exit policy?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Amazon abuse report
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Amazon abuse report
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread