[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-relays] Checking a bridge
Gary Anderson:
> I have the same worry as Martin. I set up a bridge on AWS 2 weeks ago by following the instructions here https://cloud.torproject.org/ and choosing a bridge image for Ireland.
>
> Setup went well, log files on startup tell me my bridge contacts the tor network, and I checked I could use my bridge by explicitly configuring it in a tor client. But the traffic I see in arm is very small (around 100 MB / week) compared to what I observed when I tested a tor relay (over 2 GB in a week-end). On the other hand, I didn't find my fingerprint in Globe.
>
> Is there something wrong or can this be a normal situation that happens sometime ? Do all fingerprints end up in Globe ?
>
>
> T.
>
Please keep threads together. Just use reply normally.
I will not send my fingerprint to globe over http. I want to keep it
secret so I can't check my bridge. I hope it works. obfs-ports are
forwarded and everything else are standard torrc-settings.
But please make globe accessible over https.
thanks
>
>
> Lunar :
>> Martin Kepplinger:
>>> When my bridge uses only the same few MBs each day, i guess it isn't
>>> used at all right?
>>>
>>> Is there a simple way to ensure it is in bridgeDB and functioning as it
>>> should?
>>
>> You can search for the bridge fingerprint in Globe:
>> http://globe.rndm.de/
>>
>> Globe will hash the fingerprint before sending it to Onionoo to prevent
>> leaks.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays