Re: [tor-relays] Platform diversity in Tor network [was: OpenBSD doc/TUNING]

[Libertas <libertas@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

>> My OpenBSD node is currently on 0.2.5.10.
> 
> Which is from the -current ports tree. On -stable it's
> tor-0.2.4.23 but I doubt that you want to run your relay on
> -current.

Huh? I compiled it from non-port source because the port at the time
was old. For my first manual compilation, I think I was on 0.2.4.23.
I'm now on 0.2.5.10 which, if I'm not mistaken, is the most recent
stable Tor release. This was also compiled from downloaded, non-port
source.

My base and ports are on -stable, not -current.

> You're wrong because you're mistaking port and package 
> (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html).

No, I know the difference. However, the ports are compiled into the
packages, no? Are the two not maintained together? I was focusing on
the port because it's a little "upstream" of the package. Also, the
port includes the necessary system changes like adding a daemon user,
so aside from the pretty minimal compilation time, it's no different
from a package install.

> Have you only even tried to mail the maintener?

That was going to come after reading some docs on port development and
writing a patch or two. I don't like establishing contact until I have
something worthwhile to offer.

> You mean activating something which is activated by default since
> 3.8 which has been released in Nov. 2005?

You got me on this one. The below line in /etc/sysctl.conf confused me:

#vm.swapencrypt.enable=0 # 0=Do not encrypt pages that go to swap

In hindsight, it's pretty obvious.

There's no need to be so aggressive, by the way. I like the generally
friendly tone here.

Libertas

On 11/05/2014 04:40 PM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:17:29 -0500, Libertas
> <libertas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> My OpenBSD node is currently on 0.2.5.10.
> 
> Which is from the -current ports tree. On -stable it's
> tor-0.2.4.23 but I doubt that you want to run your relay on
> -current.
> 
>> If compilation is considered tedious, though, I or someone like
>> me could start more aggressively maintaining the Tor port.
> 
> You're wrong because you're mistaking port and package 
> (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html).
> 
>> I was actually considering this recently, although I have no
>> prior experience with port development.
> 
> Have you only even tried to mail the maintener?
> 
> Quoting another mail from you for the lulz:
> 
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:04:43 -0500, Libertas
> <libertas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Another example that I forgot to mention earlier: encrypting swap
>> on Debian or Ubuntu involves apt-getting and such. On OpenBSD,
>> it involves changing two characters of /etc/sysctl.conf.
> 
> You mean activating something which is activated by default since
> 3.8 which has been released in Nov. 2005?
> 
> Cheers, Vigdis _______________________________________________ 
> tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=ubVg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays