Re: [tor-relays] Fast Exit Node Operators - ISP in US

[jason@xxxxxxxxx]

sorry was https://www.rokabear.com/ not roku
-Jason

On 11/28/2014 01:56 AM, jason@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Someone may wish to look into Rokubear, I remember them being mentioned
> as Tor Exit friendly a few years back.
> -Jason
> 
> On 11/28/2014 01:54 AM, Syrup-tan wrote:
>> Turns out the colocation costs $672/year for the network, and another
>> $780/year for power, so I don’t think Voxility is very feasible for an
>> exit node without bargaining with them.
>>
>>> If anyone knows of a good way of finding high-bandwidth budget
>>> dedicated servers (a search term or a list of providers, for example),
>>> please share. I expected there to be more of a market for this kind of
>>> thing than I've found.
>>
>> I recently rented a dedi from Online.net
>> <http://Online.net> (http://www.online.net/en/dedicated-server/dedibox-xc)
>> which offers unmetered b/w, but I’ve heard bad things about the network.
>> I’ll do some testing this weekend on whether or not I can get the full
>> 150Mb/s link.
>>
>>> On Nov 27, 2014, at 5:39 PM, Libertas <libertas@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> <mailto:libertas@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>
>> On 11/25/2014 02:29 PM, Syrup-tan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The colocation isn’t cheap to say the least, and it only gives
>>>>> 5TB/month unless we want to pay more per month;
>>>>>
>>
>> This may the largest logistical problem I've encountered when looking
>> for dedicated servers intended to be exit nodes. For most providers,
>> even expensive and powerful servers (16+ GB of RAM, 8+ cores) will
>> come with 2-10 TB of monthly bandwidth. Because much cheaper servers
>> can saturate a 100 Mbps link (IIRC) and thereby greatly exceed those
>> limits, buying such packages just doesn't make sense. The additional
>> bandwidth prices are usually strangely high, too. The pricing is often
>> progressive - each additional terabyte costs more than the last.
>>
>> If anyone knows of a good way of finding high-bandwidth budget
>> dedicated servers (a search term or a list of providers, for example),
>> please share. I expected there to be more of a market for this kind of
>> thing than I've found.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays