Re: [tor-relays] 130 "11BX1371" relays joined on 2015-10-30

[nusenu <nusenu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Should they actually be blocked though?
> 
> I mean, it's a lot of relays, but they're also contributing actual exit
> bandwidth and it's not like they're spread over hundreds of /16s.
> 
> Maybe this calls for some dirauth-level patches to throttle families of
> servers to a certain CW?

I would vote for dirauth enforced families.
Dirauths could put such relays into a family that has been defined by
the dirauths, so that clients won't use more than one relay of that group.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays