[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] /24?

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] /24?
From: teor <teor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 07:40:00 +1000
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:41:43 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1574718087; bh=y34npkPyo0OgHKxYva46JgnXTDxPBuUL4IUldmQioKk=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:References:To:From; b=fHhkk67pmillEwr94dvfKeo4iAxAjwSD6BmguAPBHmxxtn8AOMe4wOREVx49rF5hT hPyPHKSmu8FIxv4Rg5/GkFPpAmIbKozZpd/oV1XLRBa/2w7yjtcFVFy1LQCdv2Ox8t KeYUL0CvSrMytNuyhQE+4yfeom7fNs3XAMz+NKVg=
In-reply-to: <c2593155-1cf9-d0b4-079d-b5c2c16df9d8@riseup.net>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAHcjhEGC-M6_1j2t+YY-FByNQNiGPPrz=s-wW_=3rsSDqqtjRg@mail.gmail.com> <cfdae4973e38b22224cd3e701eb2a54f@for-privacy.net> <CAHcjhEHf=F1htFiQCdW5m3rO71YyUmp93gcxg7gRonh3244y3w@mail.gmail.com> <em88a0e80e-e8fe-476b-8706-49f47e633149@erk-supern> <FA1F7261-72F0-4960-85E9-958E1C96CBDB@riseup.net> <c2593155-1cf9-d0b4-079d-b5c2c16df9d8@riseup.net>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

> On 26 Nov 2019, at 05:20, nusenu <nusenu-lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> teor:
>> Tor clients automatically exclude relays in the same IPv4 /24 
> 
> huh, in what version was this changed to /24?
> The tor man page still has the former value in tor version 0.4.1.6
> 
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24393
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/15518

Sorry, this was my mistake, I copied from the original reply, and
only checked the IPv6 value.

Tor clients automatically exclude relays in the same IPv4 */16* and
IPv6 /32 when choosing paths. (IPv6 support was added in 0.4.0.)

https://github.com/torproject/tor/blob/master/src/feature/nodelist/nodelist.c#L1957

T

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily line commented out but stays valid?
  - From: Michael Gerstacker
- Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily line commented out but stays valid?
  - From: ECAN - Matt Westfall
- Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily line commented out but stays valid?
  - From: teor
- Re: [tor-relays] /24?
  - From: nusenu

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Minimum traffic for a relay to be helpful to the network
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily line commented out but stays valid?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] /24?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily line commented out but stays valid?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread