[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] VPS

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] VPS
From: I <beatthebastards@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:40:52 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 16:41:01 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; d=inbox.com; s=s1; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/D0FRTFzyRYrJyMWT2vRqYNtzPzxKGbyOvnJBzPBAfo=; b=yecoTybun5UmUS9ljEcROqoKSdBkr/GfnKuSfwFewh+lHUqUvDAXtXkB431Sg49RhKRV PRJbplhZwotrkKAO0OuHjuGjuxKI6uAi0CZfQy4jhssQSexYvqkMzT1sHlJ4Vfu0k1QvuB NnwI9T8oy3oZiuuqK7XV5LtdSs0ROexdg=
Domainkey-signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=inbox.com; s=s1; h=mime-version:date:message-id:from:subject:to:content-type; b=PIIj8PSpZ4vbP+ZGGnmSxeDReglNJv+oWi484+JJBme5kcbnUZDtAFNvic+AG0X0sBTX gXk11p1bVgS0q/GEQWN6kCnKlLTVlishPglBTqxBPx4iz/aKuFdMYNHPP6Ph3BDMIT/vNQ uL2z0sl/hTcB9tCh9C45TZtJtrE5u4R+A=
In-reply-to: <20131020193635.7e15849e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <6f8ys311lk8aw0uo2yp7r1da.1382187075825@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <526419bc.9040508@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Mick,

Is Serverstack.nl particularly pro-tor exit nodes? 
By the front page it would seem so.

Robert


> 
> I run tor perfectly happily on a VPS with 512MB of RAM. That node
> is on a Gig backbone, advertises 2.1 MB/s (2100 KB) and shovels data at
> anywhere between 24 and 32 Mbit/s all day every day for a monthly
> total of anywhere from 9.5 to 10.5 TiB per month.
> 
> See
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/C332113DF99E367E4190424CE825057D91337ADD
> 
> last rebooted when I upgraded to Tor 0.2.4.17-rc about three weeks
> ago.
> 
> The limiting factor on a pi is not just memory. It is CPU.
> 
> Mick
>

____________________________________________________________
FREE 3D MARINE AQUARIUM SCREENSAVER - Watch dolphins, sharks & orcas on your desktop!
Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/marineaquarium


_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] VPS
  - From: mick

References:
- [tor-relays] VPS
  - From: Eduard
- Re: [tor-relays] VPS
  - From: mick

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] minimum ram
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] minimum ram
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] VPS
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] VPS
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread