[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Traceroute measurement from Tor relays

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Traceroute measurement from Tor relays
From: Gordon Morehouse <gordon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:22:47 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 17:23:20 -0400
In-reply-to: <7073B949A61DDC49928096C733B78A961AE6101D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5267E697.4070002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <alpine.LRH.2.02.1310230906070.27230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7073B949A61DDC49928096C733B78A961AE6101D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Das, Anupam:
> So we have received some questions about running our traceroute
> measurements. Let me answer some of the questions:

Here are two more:

1. Is the traffic to go *through* tor, or just clearnet off the
machine running the relay?

2. Is this only applicable to exit relays?  That's not clear at all,
whether results from non-exit relay boxes (or bridges) are useful or
wanted.

Best,
- -Gordon M.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSbYQlAAoJED/jpRoe7/ujJW4IAIJcR9JaT+IM53gAR5kvfcB6
Zojv3qzSJIycKBelfLP/A50u8ha0N3UwMM2aMaOPF9kqKirCJUwNEQX5v/4JzDWF
7TrU9LXgHnMbHkDJMjNchEvnGNHLQSMb2hDyQs5yzbY2KVcnfuGfIs1njAsRN7gE
rvVuQB9VhiLY0iP91FJPVe20598BsPT9yc8cfSDiZJipvNqtC3Wl9cVwMIE3vWaJ
dUuqR2keXSANcIKnjgflOGfgsHxC4G/sTHzFRV288HSNqhZ+WG9XOsaQy7ZRAJaG
IYYOyqWfpHKBcCOLfrwawul0mOo0QKZxXkx9BpqjW2j+/ZJd4bUlDueLHNEKfjo=
=svH0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Traceroute measurement from Tor relays
  - From: Das, Anupam
- Re: [tor-relays] Traceroute measurement from Tor relays
  - From: Nikita Borisov

References:
- [tor-relays] Traceroute measurement from Tor relays
  - From: Karsten Loesing
- Re: [tor-relays] Traceroute measurement from Tor relays
  - From: Aaron Hopkins
- Re: [tor-relays] Traceroute measurement from Tor relays
  - From: Das, Anupam

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] minimum useful ram
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] max TCP interruption before Tor circuit teardown?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Traceroute measurement from Tor relays
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Traceroute measurement from Tor relays
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread