Re: [tor-relays] too many circuit creation requests

[trshck_tor@xxxxxxxxxx]

Mmmm... I think the first email hasn't been sent...

# lsof -Pn | grep "^tor" | grep ESTABLISHED | wc -l
3169
# netstat -nt | wc -l
1599

On 2015-10-24 18:56, starlight.2015q3@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> At 18:23 10/24/2015 -0000, trshck_tor@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Thank you,
> >
> > I've tried:
> >
> > DirPort 0
> > HidServDirectoryV2 0
> > RelayBandwidthRate 300 KB
> > RelayBandwidthBurst 600 KB
> >
> > and restarted.
> >
> > Now it still has 100% CPU and about 3500-4000 inbound
> > connections. The log is full of the same warning.
>
> Keep in mind the handshake stats increase
> forever and include circuits that are long
> gone.  If however you are quoting
>
>   netstat -nt | wc -l
>
> 3000+ would be insanely large for relay
> rated around 100.  Let the list know if
> that's the case as it would be some kind
> of bug or attack.  Make sure the connections
> are to the relay daemon and not some other
> process.  'lsof -Pn' is good for that.
>
> > Buying some equipment is a possibility. I prefer
> > miniature computers because of their low consumption.
> > What would you recommend?
>
> I've never run one, but corresponded with an
> exit operator who has a Beagle Board
> Black on a Comcast connection.
>
> e_fs_ BeagleBoneBlackA5B1 US 490 44 4.27 L 50.129.135.213 443 80 
> ....comcast.net
>
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/EFE9BC81FBCE1CC52E1DCA97E760723CAD622E1C
>
> He expressed great satisfaction with it and quoted
> its merits vs the Pi at length.  They have a newer
> X15 version of the board now due out next month:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BeagleBoard
>
> Good luck with it!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays