I'm running on DO as well with the reduced exit policy and have had about five complaints in 2 months. DO certainly appears to be getting less and less happy. I'm glad to know it's not just me, though. Hopefully a curated list of IPs to reject will help a lot. Thanks for the link to tornull. Exit Node fingerprints: E553AC1CA05365EA218D477C2FF4C48986919D07 889550CB9C98CF172CB977AA942B77E9759056C2 Alecks On 10/07/2016 07:04 PM, Matthew Finkel wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:16:39AM +0200, Markus Koch wrote: >> 2016-10-08 0:09 GMT+02:00 Tristan <supersluether@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> This page has 3 policies: Reduce exit policy, reduced-reduced exit policy, >>> and a lightweight example policy. >>> >>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy >>> >>> >>> On Oct 7, 2016 5:01 PM, "Markus Koch" <niftybunny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> reduced-reduced exit policy. ? >>>> >>>> Illuminate me, pls. >>>> >> Thank you both! >> >> Will try https://tornull.org. Perhaps it helps. >> >> Markus >> > > I spotchecked a few of the rejects on the list. Spamhaus returned a page > showing only [0][1][2][3]: > > Error SH-403-001 > > > Are all of those tornull rejects legit? > > Another one I checked said: > > "Network operated by cybercriminals, providing services to spammers and > botnet operators. Can't trust anything originating from AS59564." > > > And that came from [4]: > > "Upstream Adjacent AS list > AS3255 UARNET-AS State Enterprise Scientific and Telecommunication Centre > "Ukrainian Academic and Research Network" of the Institute for Condensed > Matter Physics of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine (UARNet),UA" > > > I worry about blindly following a list of rejected subnets. I won't argue that > it's not safer for the exit operator, but I hope someone's cross-checking and > confirming each entry is needed. > > > [0] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL113323 > [1] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL169644 > [2] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL300589 > [3] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL310432 > [4] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL244638 > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >
Attachment:
0x26CA0F78.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays