> On 18 Oct 2016, at 00:49, Tristan <supersluether@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > "Windows" and "Tor relay" don't really go together. The Windows bufferevents code rotted due to lack of testing, so it's hard to run a performant Tor relay on Windows. But we'd welcome patches to get Tor working better on Windows. After all, a large number of Tor clients, and some hidden services, are on Windows. Tim > On Oct 17, 2016 8:47 AM, "Petrusko" <petrusko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > RPi 2/3 if I'm not wrong are around 3 Watts (fanless) > An old P4... For sure it's not lower than 60 Watts power consumption > > And if he wants to run only a Tor relay, advantage to have Windows OS is > relative ;) > Not really agree... > > But agree about cpu speed ;) > I don't remember, RPi v3 has the famous AES-NI that make everything > faster for Tor ? :s > > > 17/10/2016 14:18, Neel Chauhan : > > The disadvantage of the PC approach is space and higher power > > consumption, but the advantage is that you can use *BSD and Windows, > > and can possibly take advantage of faster speeds. > > -- > Petrusko > PubKey EBE23AE5 > C0BF 2184 4A77 4A18 90E9 F72C B3CA E665 EBE2 3AE5 > > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays