On 10/26/2016 06:58 PM, Nicholas Merrill wrote: > Hi Kenneth > > I am with a New York state non-profit organization that runs a number of > exits. I am not a lawyer, but I have surely spent years discussing > these and other related issues with many lawyers. Good to know. Keeps me and my cohorts from reinventing the wheel. > I could be wrong, but I think LLC was only mentioned as an example of a > type of legal entity in that article. It's not that you couldn't use a > classic "C corporation" just the same. The central point was to have a > separate legal entity - a corporation ( even an incorporated association > or club might work.) A non-profit is generally formed as a corporation > anyway. I figured as much, on both counts, but I wanted to nail it down. That a Tor exit node is best run under the aegis of some sort of corporate set-up is a given; *which* set-up doesn't particularly matter. Is this a fair assessment? > So probably that Idaho nonprofit would be fine. I'd be happy to talk to > them if it's helpful, and/or provide referrals to others. Much appreciated! Come to think of it, there's another nonprofit venue with which I am involved which may be suitable for Tor. Stay tuned.
Attachment:
0xDD79757F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays