Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

["Dr Gerard Bulger" <gerard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

So far I have had no abuse emails or complaints after two months on a new server, using the longer suggested reduced policy list, but I do exclude 80, which seems safer but limits the role as an exit. But 443 open. I closed other potential abuse ports such as 22, 8080, 5900.

It's not the complaints that worry me, but the reaction of the ISP with any complaints, so best avoided until I can afford to be my own ISP.

What are the risks of abuse reports in opening up a wide range of high port numbers as an exit say 20,000-50,000? 

Gerry
 

-----Original Message-----
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cristian Consonni
Sent: 12 October 2017 11:10
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Just got my first Abuse email :-)

Hi Paul,

On 11/10/2017 13:28, Paul Templeton wrote:
>> I believe in such case you are supposed to reply to your provider
> I will

For my experience, I do the same.

>> There was a mini discussion recently on that, with the general 
>> consensus seeming to be that keeping it open is more trouble than it's worth.
>> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-October/013188
>> .html
> I'll drop port 22

You may be interested in these Reduced Exit Policies:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy

there are several of them which are progressively strictest and stricter.

Cristian
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays