[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
From: teor <teor2345@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:27:20 +1000
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:27:41 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=JRmXIDdKIvbNVbwL3fRu9MezuNUGil+fjMwpmUALL6U=; b=kBKXa4svxX7urGnJcHtuhXhkrNBiQYHZ5yY7dKonej/RA3kuB/b+gPFdJi9jSm6GUA znJbAlWsGKsXqvNGjLzWs9DK0RYR7UUkQSvPvPVN8CQcwOcHOZIarPKLRaxHcpO7HLPX jrNCT8BMlfKeXbPQo4HihshLqgwLa0YLKG+GhmPjNj+Jj/2XmDrXaG7gKibYjH0gCF++ 4RJPMIspg6uDg+BxOqRsuva1moJ6iEyt8KluxnckuWgZK6Gj9UnP5+wk2OFwt3TYAwil UncYgwYFVW9h+i82wuKU9k2mLWirZr8ws01QE8+qb38iJv//d5C1/2GNwqFkaVceHoqn i3LQ==
In-reply-to: <g2AfbRnZwj7rpoW7unVS9EjkxsHuWjpp_WzogWrHbMC9a02A3WiV9OkJbdQ4wSc9LZUtYUpPqotl_5QVOsfWKeSYI1yL4JMccHIiTzhOnIo=@anondroid.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <QTlCJnn5auSZC943ztcPY3TGNuZ2D_W3bYbszrKodKvvFCnsosMtap0ms4vo5ByEdYiibbQLSy1D2lebNvThoISi_OiqaH1HrZq9e_JQq5U=@anondroid.com> <50f4a97a-0ba1-8358-c1fc-5656309eb3bd@sky-ip.org> <5cclKGSrci19U5AjIKPNx1AOmjasIVtia6rSupXUSAdhveoZmXfLX2aZc3bx-wwiMaakB_41CtmNdY5YMXOTIrXZz-0EBEN86aWwHWXzbWc=@anondroid.com> <FC658C7F-A466-4F9D-B577-69CB22CD4235@gmail.com> <0o0jCPwGT9d-ucpdgtyHGvHm9iYYyDi-tju1XeT859PM1UjkHSZGMDAHOXCEBygWaClWE0Ks0fq6xCETOdSlJqXxVsPY47r31LL5fyfKkSs=@anondroid.com> <BB3B6483-12C1-4C4E-B55C-5C38FCA19955@gmail.com> <g2AfbRnZwj7rpoW7unVS9EjkxsHuWjpp_WzogWrHbMC9a02A3WiV9OkJbdQ4wSc9LZUtYUpPqotl_5QVOsfWKeSYI1yL4JMccHIiTzhOnIo=@anondroid.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> On 19 Oct 2017, at 08:17, tor <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> It's a shame there's no Ubuntu package for the long-term support Tor release. Thanks Teor for filing a ticket, but it doesn't look like it will be acted upon. It seems like a problem to me. I guess it's a matter of what is considered "stable"? Seems like the package maintainer thinks 0.3.1.7 is stable, while you (Teor) think it's not? I'm stuck with it for now.

0.3.1.7 is stable.
But it's not Long Term Support.
And it's understandable that they want to reduce their effort.

I'm not sure that using 0.2.9 will help you, anyway.

> I've scaled both of my fallback nodes up a bit (more CPU and RAM), and things seem stable at the moment. We'll see what happens. I'll take note of when the HSDir flag comes back.

HSDir load spikes typically only last a day.

T
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
  - From: tor

References:
- [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
  - From: tor
- Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
  - From: s7r
- Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
  - From: tor
- Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
  - From: teor
- Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
  - From: tor
- Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
  - From: teor
- Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
  - From: tor

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Balancing throughput versus getting Black-Holed
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] About relay size
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] "Bug: Duplicate call to circuit_mark_for_close"
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread