[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP
From: teor <teor2345@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 23:24:36 +1100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 08:24:59 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=ozxVGN4tSJdNSM0Sr0V5q8pBr82MGu7Q8A2hV1OLNto=; b=ErTK1G62F9DnAc7ZI2oJZc7hMBCevECAplGX/tDu/HmAoD+N9uQM2AF7Btd/VBCzcx N2+NxfmhW1uVxpPa1jdfoktRUAAMeh6AmWd7fwQcz4AIoPelr6Lyc5X1H5zpGJ6o5h0V qFzsZZQIlCfS4p8KzSg1tM59tX7b2AKTJKCKqO9tzDMjFCKuT5buP3zLjx+6FKwi9B94 ai3gllArKXflQI7McjB2Ws57sZqk0H2/JOALFw+fowZshkr31i8aWXB/a94DhxlRYXYB YvwE80SCuB4fKf8Wt4IsxNjeFviuqYS0pNFNaBrxjlZP2afeE3m0mZBA6vn5GiCSasv3 EyTw==
In-reply-to: <f15e8bdf-c840-7bb8-4666-c056c8e95f7c@gmx.de>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <f15e8bdf-c840-7bb8-4666-c056c8e95f7c@gmx.de>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> On 29 Oct 2017, at 22:18, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I assumed that 2 Tor at the same ip address would get haöf of the consensus of the previously runnning only one Tor relay at the same hardware.
> But it semes, that both Tor relays get now the same value as the one before.
> 
> Is this intended ?

Possibly.

Are the relays CPU-limited, or bandwidth-limited?

T
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP
  - From: Toralf Förster

References:
- [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP
  - From: Toralf Förster

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] SSH brute force attempts to connect to my Middle Relay IP address
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Testing Golang relay implementation
Previous by thread: [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread