[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1 - 3.4.1 seems ok

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1 - 3.4.1 seems ok
From: Felix <zwiebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 00:41:17 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 18:42:24 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1634942470; bh=xXF62bZQGAySZV2bXc8r1QUDGKbfmlrUmZOtwGs1BXk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Dm05h2f9STv3EoU5nLKQib2VF5hMH20KfpaStfFtiZAkAFCAzZ/Doo3DT0rl62Cow 82Z7kFhNtCzfvhPDx7Wt0C9rO1IAbzoFvbdHjYLTPphZOcs8MXPFxuIbOr+GTC/7Kp cmKJLzAhLMoh7CVmUH4+HXzVN8cGKgYnCA0Y6gBs=
In-reply-to: <aa3d1d4d-7b40-7cd7-315d-722b677f96fd@gmx.de>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5F65A2F7.9090209@quantentunnel.de> <5F6735AA.1090103@quantentunnel.de> <aa3d1d4d-7b40-7cd7-315d-722b677f96fd@gmx.de>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.1

Hi All

Libressl 3.4.1 (devel) seems to run for us.

Oct 22 21:06:26.894 [notice] Tor 0.4.6.7 running on FreeBSD with

Libevent 2.1.12-stable, OpenSSL LibreSSL 3.4.1, Zlib 1.2.11, Liblzma
5.2.5, Libzstd 1.5.0 and Unknown N/A as libc.

Am 20.09.2020 um 14:32 schrieb Toralf Förster:

On 9/20/20 12:57 PM, Felix wrote:


Please somebody can _confirm_ this thing?

Much more worse:

The relay here under a hardened Gentoo Linux with LibreSSL 3.2.1 has only 50% of the amount of the conenctions as with 3.2.0 at all - and the TCP traffic dropped down by nearly 100%.

I recompiled Tor to ensure, that it is not an ABI issue where API looks ok - Tor doesn't play well with LibreSSL 3.2.1.

Will roll back to 3.2.0 here


Toralf, it would be super nice if you could check on your end, or
somebody else can confirm?

--
Cheers, Felix
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1 - 3.4.1 seems ok
  - From: Toralf Förster
- Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1 - 3.4.1 seems ok
  - From: George

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] Loss of Guard and HS Dir flags
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Overloaded state indicator on relay-search
Previous by thread: [tor-relays] What is: Channel padding timeout scheduled
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1 - 3.4.1 seems ok
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread