[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Getting max bandwidth out of a relay

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Getting max bandwidth out of a relay
From: Jesse Victors <jvictors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:41:42 -0600
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:47:17 -0400
In-reply-to: <mailman.13.1378987202.15553.tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=C20BEC80
References: <mailman.13.1378987202.15553.tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


> As I am trying to avoid using too many IPs (IPv4 is constrainted, IPv6
> is not, but the latter won't get much traffic), I'll try if I can get my
> tcp-balancer idea setup in the run of next week (low on spare cycles at
> the moment) and then forcing each Tor instance to use a specific core.
Right, you can only get two Tor instances per IP, at least on IPv4. The
third won't get any significant bandwidth.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJSMcSWXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxMjgyMjhENjEyODQ1OTU1NzBCMjgwRkFB
RDk3MzY0RkMyMEJFQzgwAAoJEK2XNk/CC+yA0psH/35+GsdqKtZxG1bC9pjaFeGr
mySy8AQ4DTj/FPhQhCtSwlh35ZFrTnagTuK49XChLcepMV830qFon56A29aL3QI/
9Je5PX5sILxNlMN4ubR5578PfZLTtkWm2j7l58VALFFTkozMVMbkmVsQp63+3AQN
MLt6VKb7p1Oob/PGaZsk+9c9gqxDl4LnT6awzcn1caRyUcchsP98BUURtNNdiIqg
7Yb03t3toVDZnkESyqo5n10dxG5OE7EN+ldrJ5jYrZoWmcHlHG6Ln/5pdLL6u/93
4yAxO6DYijzBIXbzzG2TU1Z1t+8s5WGa5ov0s6EdssxqszfK23KgZmBWIESnP9A=
=ctNz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Why is my fast relay so slow to gain popularity?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Future versions and Vidalia?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Getting max bandwidth out of a relay
Next by thread: [tor-relays] Exit flag given to nodes with nearly-all-reject?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread