|
Yep,weird. I've installed both at
the same time, on an clean ubuntu out-of-the box system
at 2013-09-11. As you can see at atlas.torproject.org #1 has been started at 2013-09-11 08:40:17 and #2 at 2013-09-11 08:40:17. @Mick: This will be solved at next restart, but i don't think the problem is caused by missing nodefamily. Thanks, Chris Weird that #1 has the stable flag and #2 don't then. "Stable" -- A router is 'Stable' if it is active, and either its Weighted MTBF is at least the median for known active routers or its Weighted MTBF corresponds to at least 7 days." The above suggests that #1 has been known to the dirauths for a while (since it got stable) and #2 either restarts a lot or has not been around for long. On 2013-09-18 20:41, Christian Dietrich wrote:Thanks, but both relays have been started at the same time. Due to the fact that they also have the same configuration, both should offer up to 1 gigabit/s bandwidth. "RelayBandwidthRate 125 MBytes RelayBandwidthBurst 125 MBytes" Both relays are exactly the same, except for the IPv4 adress.Your #2 relay is only advertising 83.96 KB/s so it's no surprise it gets low traffic. Can it be that #1 is an old relay and #2 is relatively new? If #2 is new it needs time to ramp up traffic: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay On 2013-09-18 18:57, Christian Dietrich wrote:Hey there, I'm currently running two tor (non-exit) relays on one host machine. "000000000000myTOR1" and "000000000000myTOR2". Now my problem is that tor relay #2 generates almost no traffic. https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/000000000000myTOR Log Relay #1: Circuit handshake stats since last time: 1566234/14743525 TAP, 10428/10433 NTor. Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 7 days 6:00 hours, with 56008 circuits open. I've sent 2167.46 GB and received 1567.97 GB. Log Relay #2: Circuit handshake stats since last time: 63/63 TAP, 1/1 NTor. Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 7 days 6:00 hours, with 4 circuits open. I've sent 1.58 GB and received 844.66 MB. Both have the same binary and configuration (except incoming/outgoing IPv4). I've also tried to switch from "fully self compiled debian, with custom kernel, and own tor binary" to "Out of the Box Ubuntu LTS, with torproject tor package" .. without any improvement. Both relays works as expected. OT: for my opinion avg 150 mbit/s (99% done by node #1) is too less for an Ivy-Bridge Based Xeon Quad Core (/w HT) on an unshared gigabit line. Apart from the fact that multithread support is really missing. Can anyone give me a hint, or am i just too stupid? Thanks ;) _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays |
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays