[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-relays] Which is more helpful, availability or speed?
On 09/26/2013 03:11 PM, phoneyball@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> If my relay is in a datacenter with a fast link but constrained by a
> in+out<100GByte monthly limit, is it more helpful to provide:
>
> * a slow relay that is usually available, e.g. 30KByte/sec available
> about two-thirds of the time, or:
>
> * a fast relay that hibernates a lot, e.g. 1MByte/sec but only available
> 1/50th of the time?
>
> Secondly, is it more helpful to be:
>
> * available every day for a fraction of that day, or:
>
> * available continuously for some consecutive days then hibernated for
> the rest of the month?
>
> Thanks for any advice. (I've read differing opinions on these questions
> written at different times, but haven't found a clear consensus.)
I don't think there is clear consensus. I would say make it available
for a consecutive timespan, and set the speed limit to something not
lower than 1 MB/s.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1854
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays