On 09/08/2015 12:14 PM, Patrick O'Doherty wrote: > I received the following response from them: > >> We do not discriminate on the use of any protocol among our customers. >> Nevertheless, if we get complains or any type of pressure from public or private >> entities for illegal activity occurring in your server, we will have to suspend >> service. >> You will be immediately contacted about any issue that arises. This explanation is marvelously vague. > so it would appear that they're not too friendly about hosting exit > relays. I've asked if they can forward all abuse complains to be instead > of immediately terminating service, but I'm not too hopeful. My hunch is that they just don't want to deal with the complaints and legal & administrative overhead -it's more cost-effective just to cut you off. When I first set up Tor some years ago I briefly ran it as an exit node, having sent an explanatory e-mail to my ISP, but I very quickly learned that once they receive a DMCA notice they cut you off at the knees, whereupon you're dealing with "help" desk morons working from a very strict script. Best to run an exit node from a corporate set-up with the legal boilerplate already in place.
Attachment:
0xDD79757F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays