[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 15



 
I really am upset on giving up. But if I cant figure this all out jensm then I can be a pain the the yazoo  to you people. I relaize the more relays the better for the project but I just think it is a bit over my head. I will check back in later and maybe unscribe tomorrow.
Daniel
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2016 at 11:30 AM
From: tor-relays-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 15
Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
tor-relays-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
tor-relays-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 12 (jensm1)
2. Re: Useful metrics for relay operators (Sebastian Niehaus)
3. Re: tor-relays Digest, 3 questions on torcc file (Kenneth Freeman)
4. Tor and Diplomatic Immunity (Kenneth Freeman)
5. Re: tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 14 (daniel boone)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 16:25:05 +0200
From: jensm1 <jensm1@xxxxxxx>
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 12
Message-ID: <bb99b042-14b4-a9fb-a643-5cad66ddf308@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

You're right, of course. The technically correct way would be to filter
by the List-Id field and thunderbird supports this. I actually didn't
know about this header field till now, thanks for pointing it out! But
as you said, most webmails are crap (gmail apparently supports it, but
not directly).

The problem is, that this functionality is usually so well hidden, that
even experienced users won't find it if they don't know exactly what
they want to do, so filtering by subject/from/to - although technically
"wrong" - is the only "visible" way to do it.


Am 04.09.2016 um 15:28 schrieb grarpamp:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:17 AM, jensm1 <jensm1@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> you can then configure your inbox to
>> put everything containing [tor-relays] into its own folder
> This is non ideal as it continues the poor notion that bloating everyone's
> subject lines with, currently 13, characters of non content junk is a good idea,
> and it will cause mismatches on nonlist material.
> The proper way to segregate a list is to match on envelope headers such as
> the included X-BeenThere:, List-Id:, Sender:, not meta material in the body.
> Unix users can easily use fetchmail and maildrop to do this.
> Thunderbird and other clients should be able to.
> Webmails are typically junk so no guarantees there.
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 16:50:13 +0200
From: Sebastian Niehaus <niehaus@xxxxxx>
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Useful metrics for relay operators
Message-ID: <6cde48b5-ffb7-104b-489a-1ff1091a7907@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Am 01.09.2016 um 05:36 schrieb I:
> Did someone mention t-shirts?

I got my weather notification in January, recieved the t-shirt one week
ago.

Thanks!


Sebastian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160904/9d693e2a/attachment-0001.sig>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 09:01:16 -0600
From: Kenneth Freeman <kencf0618@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, 3 questions on torcc file
Message-ID: <164af3e8-5cc6-0a67-61f1-af23bc0f4b4d@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"



On 09/03/2016 05:35 PM, jensm1 wrote:
> I agree to everything Matt said.
>
> A good rule of thumb for tor configuration is "leave everything at
> default, unless you've got a reason to change it".

I concur. Generally speaking you really don't have to get under the hood
much. Tor's ready to roll right out of the chute!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xDD79757F.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3129 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160904/dc1bb4d2/attachment-0001.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160904/dc1bb4d2/attachment-0001.sig>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 09:11:34 -0600
From: Kenneth Freeman <kencf0618@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tor-relays] Tor and Diplomatic Immunity
Message-ID: <16b1d562-1ae4-d320-ae4c-44e7d28c73e0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Do embassies and consulates run Tor nodes? AFAIK no studies have been
done on this, but diplomatic immunity and Tor would seem to be a match
made in Heaven.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xDD79757F.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3129 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160904/22ccba6c/attachment-0001.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160904/22ccba6c/attachment-0001.sig>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 17:30:52 +0200
From: "daniel boone" <homer2@xxxxxxx>
To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 14
Message-ID:
<trinity-6e94e30c-bdeb-402d-a4cd-e408cd84effc-1473003051943@3capp-mailcom-bs10>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/attachments/20160904/f4afc62f/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


------------------------------

End of tor-relays Digest, Vol 68, Issue 15
******************************************
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays