Whoops, forgot to paste the link: https://tor.stackexchange.com/questions/12638/how-old-is-too-old-tor-versions
Well, according to this question I asked on Tor's StackExchange, version 0.2.4.26 is still technically in the recommended consensus.
At any rate, running an older version is better for diversity, isn't it?
On Sep 21, 2016 2:13 AM, "shraptor" <shraptor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 2016-09-20 20:58, Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:20:03PM +0200, shraptor wrote:
What's up with these messages I get in tor-arm and log?
Caching new entry debian-tor for debian-tor [62 duplicates hidden]
What is tor doing??
Sep 20 19:10:21.000 [notice] Caching new entry debian-tor for debian-tor
It looks like this notice-level entry was changed to an info-level entry
starting in Tor 0.2.7.1-alpha:
...
So it looks like you are running an old version of Tor? You should
upgrade and the line should go away. In any case it should be harmless.
Yeah well I'm running on rpi3 and it says in tor-arm that 0.2.5 is the recommended
version for this architecture.
Anyway I checked out your public repo's of armhf compiled tor packages.
These packages are unfortunately dependent on libsystemd that is not welcome on my systems.
I am running devuan as OS.
So I have looked into building a newer version myself but it is a bit of jungle
to setup the tool chain for me.
I hadn't noticed this log-message before and had some trouble with my relay so felt the need to seek information.
/scooby
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxg
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-re lays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays