Always watching my ass to be a good old Tor operator, I got my nodes on the list. Always fun to see how one time not updating all your MyFamily's gets you marked for life xD Time for some conf-updating. On 27/09/16 19:37, nusenu wrote: > pa011@xxxxxx wrote: >> there is that list of "potentially_dangerous_relaygroups" you published. >> Could yo please emphasize a bit more on what brings a relay on that list, apart from incorrect given MyFamily which doesnt seem to be always the case. >> I mean I see quite a few well respected names on that list ? > > > to quote from https://github.com/ornetstats/stats > (1) "dangerous" in the sense that a tor client might has a chance to > use more than one of these relays in a single circuit > (2) these relays are aggregated based on contact information > (3) if their groupsize is bigger than their effective family size > and they are operated in more than one /16 network block they are listed > (4) this list might contain false-positives (contact information is > not authenticated) > > Does that answer your question? > > I probably should also filter entries where two out of guard_prob, > middle_prob and exit_prob are 0 since that means that (1) is never the > case - iff onionoo is right about these probabilities. > > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > -- Tim Semeijn Babylon Network PGP: 0x2A540FA5 / 3DF3 13FA 4B60 E48A E755 9663 B187 0310 2A54 0FA5
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays