> On 5 Sep 2017, at 11:18, Paul Templeton <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> So, in Australia, if you're running a Tor relay, it's actually easier to >> *not* be an ISP. > > I'm testing this with AGs department - I have put in a request to see if Tor falls outside of the scope - That is it's not a commercial service. The law only states commercial services that you charge for or make money from. > > They are taking their time to respond. > > Paul > > PS - I didn't state what services I was deploying just it wasn't a commercial service and I'm trying to find a lawyer to help navigate. I remember hearing that another organisation tried to get an explicit "not in scope" from AGs. It took them a long while to get a response. (I don't have a specific reference, sorry.) T -- Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays