[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?
From: Ralph Seichter <m16+tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:08:25 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:08:46 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=monksofcool.net; s=bravo; t=1505311708; bh=2mfxvJzJ8K01a/emZHWIvfRnnWG/32dcjeQ0uvzjndQ=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Language; b=QsbfTRRdAO7XynnW+52SMSw0UME5ZPs3cxInHUXhHJJrJV3LSJptjUUXhbglCCweB TF9DM6EXyI9Chb420GfNaRXYpVOBVP6aUOahZaXX0tAMr3kv8GYjXtu8cfeGshdbXW X465O4qtzZBi4UYxRvl3EqbIlaAEV5rjdcxXVQiouTr4QxDA+RDrUKprVMGY196HZB TbPkMFO/9yDIwXOArh0fLzoFpBolTreWUbK2doQlnciCnGxV/wQvpLzpKclo0tdPkJ c3P7NtrO9odRXxOr0X2qq7iWf24PJsVKX8Ubp7Q2tiUJh8h/XGuVdX4iw4lK1WowJk e890S6jkA+HXQ==
In-reply-to: <24a167b1-1233-0acb-fd9d-a2cf72920e24@torservers.net>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <24a167b1-1233-0acb-fd9d-a2cf72920e24@torservers.net>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 13.09.17 15:49, Moritz Bartl wrote:

> We're thinking about introducing an auto responder to abuse mail which
> then requires clicking a link or replying to the mail again before the
> complaint actually reaches a human. What do you think?

For my exit nodes, I have tested rejecting obviously auto-generated
complaints on arrival (SMTP code 5xx), with a customised text stating
how a human can get in touch with me via a different, unpublished mail
address. No human has yet used this second address, but my method sure
saves me time by weeding out most robot-generated complaints.

-Ralph
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?
  - From: Moritz Bartl

References:
- [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?
  - From: Moritz Bartl

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] HOW-TO: Simple DNS resolver for tor exit operators
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Tor-arm failure
Previous by thread: [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread