[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-relays] FallbackDirectoryMirrors selection criteria "uptime"
hi,
Fallback directory mirrors [1] seem to be selected (if the need should
arise, according
to release planning and whatnot) with criteria "uptime", among others.
And it's only
this criteria I'm thinking about here:
Now, in the wiki we have advice on how to improve relay security, and
among many,
there is advice to wipe the master key / identity every 1-2 years [2].
Fallback directory mirrors are *selected* based on uptime, and
*expected* to stay up,
of course, for about at least 2 years. This somehow encourages to keep
your identity
forever.
That's a contradiction and it might end up in *not* selecting relays,
whos operators care
a lot about security.
thanks
martin
[1]
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/FallbackDirectoryMirrors
[2]
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorRelaySecurity#Vector1:DeployEphemeralIdentityKeys
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays