[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-relays] FallbackDirectoryMirrors selection criteria "uptime"



hi,

Fallback directory mirrors [1] seem to be selected (if the need should arise, according to release planning and whatnot) with criteria "uptime", among others. And it's only
this criteria I'm thinking about here:

Now, in the wiki we have advice on how to improve relay security, and among many,
there is advice to wipe the master key / identity every 1-2 years [2].

Fallback directory mirrors are *selected* based on uptime, and *expected* to stay up, of course, for about at least 2 years. This somehow encourages to keep your identity
forever.

That's a contradiction and it might end up in *not* selecting relays, whos operators care
a lot about security.


thanks

                         martin


[1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/FallbackDirectoryMirrors [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorRelaySecurity#Vector1:DeployEphemeralIdentityKeys
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays