[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Torservers relay family decreased?



I don't think that niftybunnys reply was that rude, but it could be more efficient.

Anyway i wouldn't say this has anything to do with to big to fail, Tobias Westerhever did a really poor job at researching and did not ask anything, instead started speculating random stuff, this is what I would call rude. Get your facts together, before starting shitting on each other, would be the minimum i would expect out of respect. The Internet is different to like it was in the 80s and 90s get used to or you will have no fun.

On 13.09.2018 19:11, Paul wrote:
Hello Tobias,

please stay - this list needs people like you and your curious questions!
I was away for a couple of days and feel ashamed that nobody came along to support you or stops this bunny.

I assume those Nifty rodents produce a lot of "Stop making shit up,  fucking disclaimer, complete bullshit, flying shit, claims shit,..." but must we all read this here?

10-15 percent of Tor reminds me very much on "too big to fail" and the behavior and rudeness in the mentioned mail is very similar to those former bank lords.

I personally don't like people showing such kind of attitude in our rows and i really hope there are more, who share my opinion.

No matter how big someone here is, or even the bigger he is, the more mindful and sensitive should he act and give example - never losing the higher goals out of sight,why we do this.

The given facts probably leave more questions then answers, but I hope some other fellows in here do have interest in them as well and start asking.

Paul



Am 10.09.2018 um 19:05 schrieb Tobias Westerhever:
Hello *,

thanks for your replies.

Since this topic seems to be overheated by now, I
decided not to ask any further questions. In my point
of view, some of the confusion was caused due to poor
documentation (as Moritz pointed out), some because of
tools returning outdated information (HE BGP, for example)
- or my own incompetence to interpret them.

However, for being new on this list, I did not expect
to get answers as rude as nifty one's
(<8D6B7146-F094-428F-97ED-F16219B5F480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>).

I will stop using this mailing list.

Best,
T. Westerhever


_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays