[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-relays] Dropped off consensus (0.4.4.5) - reason is Libressl 3.2.1
Hi everybody
Sep 18 21:00:22.384 [notice] Tor 0.4.4.5 running on FreeBSD with
Libevent 2.1.12-stable, OpenSSL LibreSSL 3.2.1, Zlib 1.2.11, Liblzma
5.2.4, and Libzstd 1.4.5.
moria1 Fast Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=566
tor26 Fast Guard Stab V2Dir Valid
dizum Fast Guard Stab V2Dir Valid
gabel. Fast Stab V2Dir Valid bw=1130
danne. Fast Guard Run Stab V2Dir Valid
maatu. Fast Stab V2Dir Valid bw=1200
farav. Fast Guard Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=2970
longc. Fast Stab V2Dir Valid bw=490
bastet Fast Guard Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=3520
2 hours after Libressl 321 -> 320
Sep 20 10:30:45.633 [notice] Tor 0.4.4.5 running on FreeBSD with
Libevent 2.1.12-stable, OpenSSL LibreSSL 3.2.0, Zlib 1.2.11, Liblzma
5.2.4, and Libzstd 1.4.5.
moria1 Fast Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=566
tor26 Fast Run Stab V2Dir Valid
dizum Fast Run Stab V2Dir Valid
gabel. Fast Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=1130
danne. Fast -Guard Run Stab V2Dir Valid
maatu. Fast Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=1200
farav. Fast -Guard Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=2970
longc. !Fast Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=70
bastet Fast -Guard Run Stab V2Dir Valid bw=3520
OWNER :: bwauth=gabelmoo
(Yeah, some Lib stuff is new too, hehe)
Libressl 321 is not compatible to what is needed to make the authorities
tor26, dizum, gabel., maatu. and longc. happy (let them not grant a
"Running"). What can that be?
Please somebody can _confirm_ this thing?
PS: We had the same trouble with Libressl 292 when 28x worked well and
30x too.
PPS: Is that a good reason to stay away from automated updates? Ok,
Libressl 321 is -devel ....
--
Cheers, Felix
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays