[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tor as a component of a cohesive anonymizing OS

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tor as a component of a cohesive anonymizing OS
From: Giorgos Pallas <gpall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:03:28 +0300
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 02:03:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <20050418204105.GU28816@eff.org>
References: <e5521566cf0b94e4041afab47b82dc6e@kaos.to> <20050418202639.GR28816@eff.org> <396556a205041813473015dde0@mail.gmail.com> <20050418204105.GU28816@eff.org>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217

Does anybody can give me any hint about how to run two instances of privoxy listening on two different ports, with two different configurations?

Chris Palmer wrote:

Adam Langley writes:

We probably want to write our own HTTP proxy designed to work well
with Tor*.


Why re-do all that work? Why not just modify Privoxy or some other 
pre-existing HTTP proxy?

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tor as a component of a cohesive anonymizing OS
  - From: Alex Iliev

References:
- Tor as a component of a cohesive anonymizing OS
  - From: dr . kaos
- Re: Tor as a component of a cohesive anonymizing OS
  - From: Chris Palmer
- Re: Tor as a component of a cohesive anonymizing OS
  - From: Adam Langley
- Re: Tor as a component of a cohesive anonymizing OS
  - From: Chris Palmer

Prev by Author: Tor v0.1.0.3-rc
Next by Author: Re: Tor v0.1.0.3-rc
Previous by thread: Re: Tor as a component of a cohesive anonymizing OS
Next by thread: Re: Tor as a component of a cohesive anonymizing OS
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread