[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[OT] mitigating or defeating syntax analysis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
not exactly sure how to articulate this, but i'll do my best.
assume there is a global adversary trying to track down an anonymous
Tor-user by using syntax analysis. that is to say, gathering sets of
sentences or paragraphs from e-mails or forums, etc. and then
recognizing similarities in the syntax (that is, the way the sentence or
paragraph is written) in order group anonymous text with non-anonymous
text and ultimately reveal the identity of an anonymous user, based on
the way they write, basically. the field of psycholinguistics would
probably be a good resource for this type of analysis.
i hope that's clear enough. so, Tor can help defeat network traffic
analysis. now, how can the anonymous user (or, more accurately,
talker/writer/blogger) mitigate or defeat this syntax analysis? are
there any scholarly papers or websites with this information, or at
least talking more about syntax analysis (perhaps there is a more proper
technical term)? for example, i think one rule would be to always use
proper capitalization and punctuation, something i never do in my
non-anonymous writing. ;)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFIB58kXhfCJNu98qARCKgqAKDkMx/gAkwC8bp1iOezK4DatzeH8gCcCB4B
c+/l/qf33g5cFiHCzAFpIS4=
=1QtU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----