[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update to default exit policy
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Update to default exit policy
- From: Dawney Smith <dawneysmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:45:08 +0100
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:45:02 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mDSb5ehBZqvys50D4ch2+SE6e+R8e0RAYkZGoqEme70=; b=UqC8u5DTSNcji9H7SpyvjIohDpH17LSfAeyw/ogdxAjbZUjnkDZMjjhinwXWjz4m2H mf5WicsgUzrVG47amwVf/Wea2nGA5qEVaPFHLK+liF6HmgB2WrRJitvQymCv8ApVb2V3 2VcR5Z9BqDUjO2zECeEIIAT8mAGp+O1Mulr08=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=FTH1Dp3kQlzcD8Ts+x/adanhDT8kAaPDXTqpMxQ3hc20vE/nMPaI8LQDtM5ANV30Sm i0U+0qTRl5PtdSFHdvUsb+pRgSZAoW31QKSqwSmVIf0ADzCLZkQnVIiIAVoJTrEBlxmc TIiHM/EbX+2b0Om7eAe6cb4xCaP9gs0bwfJuY=
- In-reply-to: <48A6DD45.1040509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Openpgp: id=5D6281F2
- References: <48A6DD45.1040509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dawney Smith wrote:
> I know this has been discussed before, but I thought I'd bring it up
> again. The following rules are in the default exit policy and I can't
> see any reason why they would be:
>
> reject *:465
> reject *:587
Just so people know. I'm not going to let this discussion die off until
I've had a definitive yes or no from the people who are responsible for
setting the default exit policy. Can someone point me in the direction
of who that might be please? I get the feeling it's one of those topics
that the people developing Tor want to avoid...
- --
Dawn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIroqkcoR2aV1igfIRAu3rAKCXva6OtdpWebDRCF32c02zZFNA7ACgtuwY
vQFVBcPDUt6mpZ5jg+EqJJ4=
=Ou4o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----