Re: [tor-talk] General question regarding tor, ssl and .onion.

[Seth David Schoen <schoen@xxxxxxx>]

MaQ writes:

> Also, while it was said that .onion encryption was of lower standard,
> wouldn't a high degree of privacy and randomness still be assured,
> except for maybe alphabet agencies and more nefarious types out there
> specifically targeting a subject or .onion addresses in general, and
> some serious work and resources would have to go into pinpointing and
> breaking said encryption?

I think it's reasonable to guess that cryptographic attacks would
be extremely expensive, so most prospective attackers today wouldn't
try them.

-- 
Seth Schoen  <schoen@xxxxxxx>
Senior Staff Technologist                       https://www.eff.org/
Electronic Frontier Foundation                  https://www.eff.org/join
815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA  94109       +1 415 436 9333 x107
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk