[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-talk] Multicore, bandwidth, relays, capacity, location
- To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [tor-talk] Multicore, bandwidth, relays, capacity, location
- From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 03:03:10 -0400
- Cc: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 03:03:45 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vQjpt6YcvMa/p6cfJjAqMfOCBGgIR2Tk6uLS95fGSrU=; b=yRLtB75xNfQ8A8ZiF4dmvaWffisNlb/WeoDi5UNqqcGr/+rzjk2xMVAEHlcZQKlf9V 5//Jq21tAu40vX9foH73URIX9BUVZfBDDdxo8jA4FizLptbhxxRvSTXAb1Q5cM6dqmSy epqT6t4viJweZLwXHleKifnj3EPRvM5eCGYHvYJu1PqF3u0WteahrYALKVsdvp25Oc5M oYLNQ1OsK5DWqeRR7ANFHMTOQIWS5yB5lUN9cr1OLXr8Y3GM54iuZrCfTgZqRKXztBqW bczngKwDAI4PDFYsN0isqPKMp8JS+arPK8Snm0tFkmwI9WLtx0N7i52pRANFGFukzo+q CiHA==
- List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
- List-help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "all discussion about theory, design, and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
- List-post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Reply-to: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Thomas White <thomaswhite@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For relays, being able to make more use of available bandwidth would
> vastly increase the network speed, furthermore make home clients see
> an improvement in their daily Tor usage. It also benefits hidden
> service people as they can then run their Tor processes on more than
> one core and thus handle higher volumes of traffic.
Tor appears maybe operating at 50% of bandwidth capacity...
https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth-flags.html
https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html
https://metrics.torproject.org/bwhist-flags.html
If that's true, more bandwidth won't have any end user affect.
So for the moment it might be worthwhile to study
reducing node based latency by ensuring relay CPU's
have similar free capacity available for circuit negotiation,
interrupt processing, and other tor functions.
And to consider not dropping more bandwidth weight into
already saturated jurisdictions, but dropping some into the
Southern Arc and Eastern Zones in an effort to avoid Orion's Belt...
https://metrics.torproject.org/uncharted-data-flow.html
[Yes I broke the thread because "no subject" and gmail
are even lamer than I].
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk