Re: [tor-talk] IBM says Block Tor

[aka <akademiker1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

IBM also develops surveilance hardware for oppressive regimes, no
surprise they are against free speech and democracy.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/02/eff-files-amicus-brief-case-seeks-hold-ibm-responsible-facilitating-apartheid

Anders Andersson wrote:
> I couldn't find what they mean with "the Netherlands is home to the
> largest number of non-malicious and malicious nodes combined" in
> Figure 1 on page 8. What differentiate a "malicious node" from a
> "non-malicious node"?
> 
> Otherwise it wasn't that bad, but the last paragraph is quite offensive:
> 
> "In general, networks should be configured to deny access to websites
> such as www.torproject.org"
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:51 AM, grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/wg/en/wgl03086usen/WGL03086USEN.PDF
>>
>> IBM Advises Businesses To Block Tor
>>
>> With Tor-based attacks on the rise, IBM says it's time to stop Tor in
>> the enterprise.
>>
>> New data from IBM's X-Force research team shows steady increase in SQL
>> injection and distributed denial-of-service attacks as well as
>> vulnerability reconnaissance activity via the Tor anonymizing service.
>> --
>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk